Sequator photo stacking software4/16/2024 I like features such as being able to see what data is being rejected by a sigma function on light frames and doing this very quickly and easily compared to PixInsight which shows you no preview before processing the full stack. I have used CCDStack a reasonable amount now for processing images from my ST8-XME astronomy camera and find it very usable and relatively powerful. I also haven’t tried MaximDL for large images such as DSLR, with the largest I typically use in Maxim being those from my SBIG ST8-XME.ĬCDStack is one of a suit of products made by CCDWare aligned to advanced usage of telescopes. MaximDL’ stacking seems fair however I haven’t had need to use it for alignment and stacking. FIT files may or may not be transferred to use of DSLR raw files – I have not tried reduction of DSLR images in Maxim. The benefits of MaximDL’s reduction frame handling for. This is significantly easier than any of the other packages which all require you to do more manual work with reduction frames. FIT needing to be calibrated/reduced and it will apply the appropriate reduction frames without you choosing reduction files of the correct temperature, binning, etc. FIT files and it will nicely sort them in to a database of reduction groups to be applied to any image you open. Provide it with a directory of all your reduction. I primarily use MaximDL for image reduction, as it’s image reduction process is very painless. I don’t tend to like the post-processing capabilities of Deep Sky Stacker so tend to finish my use of DSS at the point it has stacked the “Autosave.tif” and take that file in to PhotoShop from there to perform post-processing.ĭeep Sky Stacker’s biggest advantage is probably it’s ease of use (very intuitive and easy to use interface) and it’s flexibility with it supporting all major file formats and handling various scenarios covering most astrophotography needs. ![]() There are often cases I find DSS will not correctly align frames where as RegiStar and PixInsight will. The registering capabilities of Deep Sky Stacker are very good but do not match the capabilities of RegiStar or PixInsight when it comes to getting a good alignment of frames. ![]() This may simply be a lack of experience on my part, as I do not use this software often. I have had some issues with processing canon RAW files with respect to getting good colour balance post-stacking so often choose to first convert the RAW files to TIF before processing. This software will read a wide variety of file formats including Canon RAW format, and process them. The best thing about this software is that it’s free, and amazingly capable for something that is free. This is a free and very capable piece of software for aligning, combining and performing post processing of astrophotographs from digital SLR cameras. Just recently in 2021 a new version of RegiStar was released so maybe there is yet life in this product?ĭo you use a Mac? Yes? Move on – DSS is only for PC. The version of RegiStar that I am familiar with is 1.0, and it wasn’t updated for some time. Registar is designed more to do a good job of one thing (registering frames) whereas PixInsight is a more complete package. If considering Registar your primary other option will be PixIsngiht. Registar has limited file formats supported, check yours are compatible or convert your files first to TIF. It will also easily handle field rotation (fixed tripod shots are OK) and pretty much any other distortion. This piece of software is so good that you can combine old film images with new digital images, or digital images from different cameras with different focal lengths and all sorts. This software is primarily intended for simply the registering (aligning) of frames such that they can be combined. ![]() It works very efficiently with large files, is amazingly capable in aligning photographs and has quite good stacking algorithms built in as a bonus. This is a smart piece of software for aligning and combining individual astrophotographs from digital SLR cameras. Please use this document as a starting place from which to find out more about these pieces of software and decide which is right for you.ĭo you understand why you might stack image in astrophotography? If not you can check out pages such as this by Karl Perera who gives some nice examples of unstacked and the effect of stacking. These programs each have their individual pro’s and con’s, and some are more suited to DSLR/mirrorless while others are more suited to dedicated astronomy cameras. This document provides a summary of some available deep sky stacking programs. Deep Sky Stacking Programs for Digital SLR Cameras
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |